Project Airbus – Talk

Flightsimmer wrote:Is there an image or something? If there is, I can't see it. :?
Whatever it is you guys are working on, im sure it will be great! FSX or FS9 or both?

sinsnowman wrote:might be a bit too soon to ask, but have you guess considered in exporting a model exceeding the poly limit of fs2004? I flew the Boeing Stearman by PropTrash and it was visually stunning, the hd texture (yeah 2048, not 1024) was so good, and most importantly, the framerate was as good as any default aircrafts that comes with fs2004, perhaps you might be interested in digging in about that?

Link: http://www.simflight.com/2011/02/02/boe ... 04-models/

Alexis wrote:

sinsnowman wrote:might be a bit too soon to ask, but have you guess considered in exporting a model exceeding the poly limit of fs2004? I flew the Boeing Stearman by PropTrash and it was visually stunning, the hd texture (yeah 2048, not 1024) was so good, and most importantly, the framerate was as good as any default aircrafts that comes with fs2004, perhaps you might be interested in digging in about that?

Link: http://www.simflight.com/2011/02/02/boe ... 04-models/

I know, I used the trick for the 380VC in order to merge it with the cabin and wingview. I have also used it in the 32x series VC to include the cabin, and will use it with this project too. But which one is this?

sinsnowman wrote:Sorry for my poor English, not sure I understand what you mean by "which one is this?"
Actually I prefer having separate models for VC & WV+cabin, since most of the time I don't need the WV until I shot videos. Also how about HD textures? Possible?

Alexis wrote:

sinsnowman wrote:Sorry for my poor English, not sure I understand what you mean by "which one is this?"
Actually I prefer having separate models for VC & WV+cabin, since most of the time I don't need the WV until I shot videos. Also how about HD textures? Possible?

I mean, which airbus model is the one you're seeing in the picture.

Regarding the models, IDK what I'll do yet. The VC is a sure bet. We'll see about the rest of the interior and WVs.
You'll see actual shots and renders in a few days.

shaosibin wrote:oh my god!
It's undoubtful an A330!
PA team is our god!
hope this model self can be with beacon lights,strobe lights,position lights,wing lights etc. ,without additional code in aircraft.cfg, like A320 V2.1!
thank you team! :mrgreen:

sinsnowman wrote:

shaosibin wrote:oh my god!
It's undoubtful an A330!
PA team is our god!
hope this model self can be with beacon lights,strobe lights,position lights,wing lights etc. ,without additional code in aircraft.cfg, like A320 V2.1!
thank you team! :mrgreen:

Actually, compared to the lights, I'm more interested in how the landing gear respond to the landing, you know A330 (and A340, perhaps :lol: ) has landing gear which behaves differently from other aircrafts, would be nice if PA could come up with a method to recreate this nice animation (you know, cls tried but screwed up)

GoldLeader wrote:

sinsnowman wrote:

shaosibin wrote:oh my god!
It's undoubtful an A330!
PA team is our god!
hope this model self can be with beacon lights,strobe lights,position lights,wing lights etc. ,without additional code in aircraft.cfg, like A320 V2.1!
thank you team! :mrgreen:

Actually, compared to the lights, I'm more interested in how the landing gear respond to the landing, you know A330 (and A340, perhaps :lol: ) has landing gear which behaves differently from other aircrafts, would be nice if PA could come up with a method to recreate this nice animation (you know, cls tried but screwed up)

Didn't it already recreate the method on A380 model?

GaryG wrote:Nice one bombardier...as you've seen, we're doing a VC, maybe now we should have second thoughts on that

Bombardier Q400 wrote:What do you mean with that? Do you mean an FSX model for merge is not needed, because you do a VC, or do you mean you think about doing an FSX model?
Sorry for not understanding

Alexis wrote:

Bombardier Q400 wrote:What do you mean with that? Do you mean an FSX model for merge is not needed, because you do a VC, or do you mean you think about doing an FSX model?
Sorry for not understanding

What he means is is that since we're doing the VC, you won't need to merge. We'll also fully implement VAS FMC, so you'll have most of the real functions there (including three individually functioning MFCDUs).

esg wrote:Vas does simulate the throttle system.

GaryG wrote:So first, you ask a question, then you edit the post, reposting and say that is not important for you because of the texture artists. Right. Then, you also said that you hope that we get the main gear contact points well coded. What happens if we do not?

And by the way, few are the texture artists out of PA that top the same quality as our talented people on board, just to make it clear.

Alexis wrote:Expect an official announcement with the certain details in the following days.

GaryG wrote:Nevermind, internet posts can be misleading at times. However, one should note that the community is shrinking as time goes by and most likely, we're the only freeware group that makes aircraf for fs. This suggests that we should care for each other's work for one day it might be history.

esg wrote:Whos saying we're only doing the A330?