To combat the moronic payload manager of FSPassengers, if in the Aircraft.cfg I go to:
fuel_flow_scalar=1.086
and I adjust it to a smaller number would that make the plane burn less fuel in the sim?
Making the A320 "fuel efficient"
Forum rules
Community-driven support for Project Airbus aircraft only.
Community-driven support for Project Airbus aircraft only.
Community-driven support for Project Airbus aircraft only.
Community-driven support for Project Airbus aircraft only.
Community-driven support for Project Airbus aircraft only.
Community-driven support for Project Airbus aircraft only.
Please read the pinned topics and search the forum before posting to make sure your question's not already been answered.
Community-driven support for Project Airbus aircraft only.
Community-driven support for Project Airbus aircraft only.
Community-driven support for Project Airbus aircraft only.
Community-driven support for Project Airbus aircraft only.
Community-driven support for Project Airbus aircraft only.
Community-driven support for Project Airbus aircraft only.
Please read the pinned topics and search the forum before posting to make sure your question's not already been answered.
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: 27 Jun 2011, 03:23
Re: Making the A320 "fuel efficient"
such a prompt response esg! thank you
Re: Making the A320 "fuel efficient"
Hi,
I want to ask, if there are bigger differences between the IAE and CFM engines in the fuel flow ratio? And which value would be closer to real consumption?
Best reagards,
Elmar
I want to ask, if there are bigger differences between the IAE and CFM engines in the fuel flow ratio? And which value would be closer to real consumption?
Best reagards,
Elmar
-
- Posts: 106
- Joined: 01 Jul 2011, 11:39
Re: Making the A320 "fuel efficient"
is 180 pax still moronic? I found a payload model with 180 pax.. but im not sure if that is enough for you because i only fly the PA380 with FSP
Re: Making the A320 "fuel efficient"
180 pax is the max passenger load for an A320. It's not 'moronic', but not too many airlines operate the 320 with that many seats. B6, for example, seats 150 in a single class configuration. Most legacy carriers with the 320 in their fleet have similar numbers (considering a mixed class configuration, bank on a number between 145 and 165). Most airlines with 180 as their configuration are charter companies and/or LCCs.karlli1221 wrote:is 180 pax still moronic? I found a payload model with 180 pax.. but im not sure if that is enough for you because i only fly the PA380 with FSP
-
- Posts: 106
- Joined: 01 Jul 2011, 11:39
Re: Making the A320 "fuel efficient"
yea i know but if 180 still doesn't satisfy the needs of "FlyByFire1256" then I would suggest flying the a380. I normally have more or less 800 PER FLIGHT.b6ifc81 wrote:180 pax is the max passenger load for an A320. It's not 'moronic', but not too many airlines operate the 320 with that many seats. B6, for example, seats 150 in a single class configuration. Most legacy carriers with the 320 in their fleet have similar numbers (considering a mixed class configuration, bank on a number between 145 and 165). Most airlines with 180 as their configuration are charter companies and/or LCCs.karlli1221 wrote:is 180 pax still moronic? I found a payload model with 180 pax.. but im not sure if that is enough for you because i only fly the PA380 with FSP