Aerosoft Airbus X A320+A321

[FLYPHOENIX]

Just incase you are inerested, they are releasing them this afternoon...
http://www.forum.aerosoft.com/index.php ... 281&st=620

[esg]

Don't know why would anybody dig in their wallet for this one, to be honest. The visual's good (albeit completely devoid of XML animations, including wingflex as far as I can tell), but PSS'/Wilco's systems are both far superior.

I guess if you're a big VC fan then yeah, this one's for you

[FLYPHOENIX]

honestly, i would agree with you esg-
but, hopefully there will be a possibility to merge...

[nzeddy]

It's delayed due to installation problems.

[esg]

Looks like they've been having some trouble

[FLYPHOENIX]

Iknow,, - plus the sites been down for ages, o communication, thankfully pairbus (freeware) dosnt have that problem

[lordsniper]

but PSS'/Wilco's systems are both far superior

yes it's for beginner intermediate (like the f-lite serie from just flight) the advanced system model will be released after the 1st one

[sinsnowman]

It's out!!!! Just look at those images..........really stunned by what they did, really want a pair of A380 wings as detailed as Aerosoft did on the PA A380.............

[FLYPHOENIX]

Yes but i am SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO pi**ed off they didnt make it fs2004 compatible!

[sinsnowman]

There are limitations in fs2004 in deed making more detailed aircraft impossible........but still fsx is too demanding on the computer's performance, which makes me stick to fs2004, that's why I'm looking forward to see a new platform/simulator which let us enjoy the details of the aircraft and scenery, without killing too much frames....

[esg]

It's out!!!! Just look at those images..........really stunned by what they did, really want a pair of A380 wings as detailed as Aerosoft did on the PA A380.............

Detailed in what respect? Detailed textures?

[sinsnowman]

When you look into the structure between the speed brakes and the wings, you can see all the supporting structure in the Aerosft's airbus.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/37209933@N08/4955923651/

But for the PA A380, the structure isn't accurately modeled, like the supporting pillers between the speed brakes and the wings, the flaps supporting structure isn't well textured as well. I don't know if it's because of the limitation of the poly, and I know I'm comparing a brand new state-of-art payware model with a freeware model which makes the whole thing unfair, but it would make the wing view much more realistic if the PA team can add more details on it =]

Real:
http://www.airliners.net/photo/Air-Fran ... a011e6a155
PA:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/37209933@N08/4955931281/

[esg]

FS9 models have a poly cap. We can't add all the details

I know I'm comparing a brand new state-of-art payware model with a freeware model which makes the whole thing unfair

Unfair, how? We got many things Aerosoft lacks (wingflex, for one)

[GaryG]

Unfair, how? We got many things Aerosoft lacks (wingflex, for one)

Haha, you hit the nail !

[sinsnowman]

Well at least it was designed for different platform..........too bad that fs2004 got poly limit and the worse thing is that it doesn't make use of my 3 other cpu cores........

[esg]

FS9 performs better on my system using 1 core than FSX using all 4 :lol:

[Alexis]

...too bad that fs2004 got poly limit

It doesn't, there's a workaround. The thing is not many are interested in applying it.

the worse thing is that it doesn't make use of my 3 other cpu cores........

+1 to esg

[sinsnowman]

Only if fs9 could use 4 of them.........we really could expect bursting framerate ^^

[GaryG]

Well....

more than 60 is all unnecessary... I see about 100 fps in fs9 on ground, sometimes even in fsx during cruise....